Are You using EditorConfig?

Heh … what should I say … I recommend Sublime Text 3 :077:

I do not have a tests for each file change as it’s generally bad idea. It may be good for small bugfix, but in normal case (enhancement or new feature) which requires to add and/or modify many files it would cause unnecessary fails.

It’s why I do not use Windows at all. They have their own standards. Look that people in France think that French is most important and everyone should know it, but it does not changes anything in typical daily English programming …

Well … Elixir was created for some purpose … If Erlang would have syntax, code, formatter and everything else from Elixir then Elixir would not be created. :smiley:

But seriously … Makefile is good example, but it’s not like that it’s used in really big percent of projects. Erlang team could create formatter if they would like to. The better way is to create formatter for each language rather than implement support for all languages in each editor which is obvious waste of time.

As said Makefile is a different case, but it’s really one file and alone does not gives enough arguments to introduce a generic formatter.

This should be able to work with Elixir formatter. Of course not many editors know .formatter.exs, but there is really no need for that. That’s why many editors have support for plugins.