Ah, I was wrong, it looks like default_fields is on a route by route basis. We should probably add a top level version of that as well.
Got a stack trace for that error? I think there is likely a bug somewhere ![]()
Ah, I was wrong, it looks like default_fields is on a route by route basis. We should probably add a top level version of that as well.
Got a stack trace for that error? I think there is likely a bug somewhere ![]()