Definitely true, and the reason why team success often has a lot more to do with political/psychological dynamics than any technical issues, aesthetic or otherwise. It can seem sisyphean but it seems obvious to me that tools like credo help. Honestly have a hard time seeing another side to that in relation to a team setting.
Practically, one thing I’ve found really helpful is to try to get some consensus off the bat there is utility in drawing a line between style “preferences“ and “errors” even when it’s not pure from a theoretical pov. Then issues idenitfied as mere style go into a basket for potential credo rules, if we can’t get the computer to enforce it we just accept variation and ignore in PR reviews. Other things, like using some random acronym for a var, are legitimate targets for callouts even though they are also arguably only about readability.
