Also just a quick thought - could you make it so that it takes a copy and works on (or makes obvious it’s) the copy? At the moment anyone new might thing it is altering the starting data, rather than returning a copy ![]()
Also just a quick thought - could you make it so that it takes a copy and works on (or makes obvious it’s) the copy? At the moment anyone new might thing it is altering the starting data, rather than returning a copy ![]()