Ah yes, the famous “let it fail” paradigm (which I’ve long been in favor of).
But in this case, I am not sure whether it will always be the case for the client code, and I like to patch the “holes” as I go, especially the ones I can tell upfront will be difficult to get by accident (except for the end users who will, by Murphy’s law, be getting plenty of those). I believe this really is a case for try/catch/repeat once more (naturally, just the :noproc exit).
