Your help is always welcome, no matter what animal format it may come in ![]()
I read the whole thing and I must say that, at least to me, I found some of his arguments convincing. However I am not as well versed in HTTP2 as others are so I am not convinced that 3 negative points about a whole protocol make it utter garbage.
All I can say is I see where he comes from and I thank you for liking me to it.
Indeed ! I am using the default timeout ![]()
I have not tried this, but having in mind we have an automatic scaled cluster behind said load balancer, this shouldn’t even be a problem to begin with, right?
We are using Google Cloud Platform.
It is not unusual for us to get 502 errors from the load balancer (an issue impossible to solve with google) so it can very well be that Google’s services aren’t as resilient as we need.


















