It is difficult to exaggerate how much discussion has been had with respect to modifying the pipe operator. The consensus response is pretty negative to such modifications, and to be honest this is a great example why.
1
|0> foo(0, 0)
|1> foo(0, 0)
|2> foo(0, 0)
This is completely indecipherable. Obviously the foo function name doesn’t help, but the whole point of the pipe operator is that there is a consistent view on what constitutes the primary noun for each function.
