Proposal: Private modules (implementation specific) (closed)

[dimitarvp]

@asummers

While I understand the technical reasons for doing so, I dislike the required alias in require . We generally do not alias things for greppability reasons, so having a way to be able to use the FQN would be nice. Up until now, alias has been opt in and composes independently with other features but this requires agreeing with two concepts to use one.

I tend to agree with that one. I think the alias part should be optional – unless the feature couldn’t work without it?