The issue with the static access operator (the dot)

[OvermindDL1]

@Qqwy

In the small programming language I am building, the current runtime state is represented as a %Jux.State{} struct. It used to have a field called stack, but at some point it turned out that it required to have a list of stacks, with most of the operations only accessing the first. But now I already wrote state.stack everywhere, and had to painstakingly replace it (What did not help, was that not all my state variables were called state, and that stack was also used as name for some other things elsewhere).

Wouldn’t static typing be nice there to catch all occurrences that you need to replace? ^.^