Good point @gregvaughn, I didn’t think about Task.Supervisor because I didn’t want to use Task because I need to keep state somewhere and I do not want to retrieve the data when they are finished but when I will receive another request to check this state.
And for the :gen_statem approach, jobs will not received really messages only a way simplify the state identification and transitions. Only at the end I will request process state and date for example using :sys.get_state. But maybe there is a better way to do.
